BUY THIS PRODUCTS FROM AMAZON.COM HERE

Never Underestimate an Old Man with A Australian Kelpie Shirt

✅ Printed in the USA

✅ High-quality

✅ Order at amazon.com

Never Underestimate an Old Man with A Australian Kelpie Shirt

Her qualifications: she's a democrat and a mom and speaks from the heart, not her head. Too true. Intellectual firepower is conspicuously absent. She does have the courage of her convictions. Adeathgrip on her left-wing faith that precludes rational thought. She claims that her principles are Christian...But clearly they are, shall we say, somewhat elastic. Please, Lydia. Don't take this personally. You suffer from the same maladies that plague all Lefties. My biggest problem with what she says: can she honestly not understand the fundamental truth of the statement liberals and traitors and terrorists; different stages of the same disease. Add "lack of analytical prowess" to her list of deficiencies, I guess. If you truly don't get it, read some Horowitz. If your friends won't disown you for doing so, that is. If you really think you're smart enough to do battle with conservative intellectuals, you'd better have a thick hide, girlie. Because Ann Coulter is not a hate-monger; she just has a a razor-sharp intellect, a very sarcastic sense of humour, and a grasp of the issues that you simply cannot match. Kenny, you raise some good points. I thought it a bit odd that Ms. Cornell thought that the Nazi's started their campaign against the Jews with jokes. Anyone heard of the book Mein Kompf? Hitler wrote it years before gaining power. He outlined everything he was going to do, it was a best seller. In fact, its still in circulation. I don't mind the other stuff though. If dems insist of reffering to people they don't like in ways that show the obvious intellegence of the writer that is their business (examples, SatAnne kkkoulter, bu$h). Makes it easier for me to skip their posts, as I am sure nothing of interest exists therein. The harder ones to skim over are the posts that simply devolve into a preschool mentality.

I will Never  an Old Man with A Australian Kelpie with Shirt

An argument whose entire premise is centers around the phrase "nu uh," or "your a stupid head." Such biting retorts, and democrates keep saying they have an intellectual superiority. Were that true we all would be in big trouble. Don't burn my fries yea abortion. Honestly, what's with all of the right-wing trolls? Kenny said on The first few Republican posts in here were less than enlightened, though I just used two of the most common talking points today in my argument (even if Ann Coulter is, herself, quite stuck on Clinton). However, there has been a whole lot of other slam the author not the work going on. All of my numbered points, as well as my earlier posts are in regarding the woman's work. But I stand by my call that we need to stick to the issues, call them on their B.S. And hit them hard. Not personally attack them or rant about something completely off topic. Look at "I Laugh at Liberals" post for example. Or Sam, or Michael. There's no shortage of bile. Ann Coulter's point that we savage each other may be valid, but it's not necessarily a bad thing. I will not defend some foaming at the mouth loony just because they happen to ally themselves with me. That would make me no better than the Democrats. I look at that as a POSITIVE. We throw out our waste, that makes us the better party. #5 on my list is: Can you defend someone in your party while slamming someone in the other party for doing the same thing? That was not a shot at anyone on the board, but instead a look back at Mrs. Cornell's work. She defends Al "Say fuck you to a Republican" Franken (twice I believe) and even uses his Ann Coulter's adam's apple joke. That's funny, that's satire. But Ann Coulter is just mean spirited and dangerous. That's her point. I called her on it. And as for me feeling I deserve praise.

When I see You Never Underestimate an because Old Man with A Australian Kelpie blue Shirt

I honestly don't know where that came from. Perhaps I came off arrogant, not my intention, OR perhaps you misunderstood me when I said valid points were ignored. I.E. Kira lumping 92 in with the 94, thereby ignoring the valid point of quoting Democrats, and classifying it as hate speech. Did I raise some good points that I wish would be addressed, yeah. I'd like to hear someone disagree with me on something on substance or try and dispute any of the long lists of quotes that have been put up by you and others, maybe try to classify them as satire perhaps? Perhaps a quote from Ann's Treason (loosely, cause I don't have the book) itself will clarify what I want here. "No one will address this simple issue. Were there communists in the gov't? McCarthy was so mean. But were there communists in the government? The HUAC were horrible people. But were there communists in the gov't? Those poor actors who were victimized. But were there communists? It seems the only thing people don't want to talk about in dealing with McCarthyism is the only thing that matters. Were there communists in the gov't? The answer is yes." That's what I'm seeing here. I'd like to hear some leftie answers to one of the many valid questions or points we've put forward instead of sneering. But instead all we get is: "Bush lied kids died." But did we have valid cause to go to Iraq. "I don't know any pro-choice Democrats, but TO ME pro-life is not going to war."

Visit our Social Network: Pinterest, Blogger, and see more at our collection.